Monday, May 6, 2013

Malick’s To the Wonder, a Wonderful Mystical Reflection on Everyone’s Vocation to Love



Pope John Paul II wrote in his Letter to Artists that one of the great dignities of artists is their ability to reveal an “echo of the mystery of God’s creation.” In Terrance Malick’s The Tree of Life, it was God’s Divine Providence along side the problem of evil.  In To the Wonder, it is the mystery of love.

Expect a similar look and feel to The Tree of life, absent of a conventional narrative. In The Tree of Life, Malick used a stunning “discovery channel type” sequence to unveil the mystery of God’s creation. In To the Wonder, he utilizes a poetic style to open the viewer’s mind, imagination, and heart to reveal the depths of true love’s mystery.  Be ready to go well beneath the surface of most “love stories.” It’s worth it!

The film opens with Marina (Olga Kurylenk) spinning and dancing through a Parisian park while her voice over prayerfully expresses with heartfelt emotion her new found love with Neil (Ben Affleck), “I open my eyes, New born” to the beautiful WONDER OF LOVE!  The scene quickly moves to Marina and Neil at Mont St. Michel, on an island off the Normandy coast.  They frolic around the picturesque, secluded and peaceful surroundings of the Mont and then inside the empty Catholic Church that sits atop the Mont.  The lovers venture through the church, gazing at the vaulted ceilings, the stone altar and the baptismal font and into its inner courtyards.

This opening sequence is no random imagery; rather it grounds the whole exploration of the mystery of love, particularly the love shared between Marina and Neil, in the transcendent and haunting Divine Love.  Could not newly found love between a man and woman that seems to spring forth from nothing be called anything else but a Divine Miracle?  It is this type of love that can only have God as its creative and mysterious source.  In fact, the name of this film is a dead give away of what Malick is trying to communicate.  In Marina's words, "We climbed the steps to the wonder."  The island and church, nicknamed "the wonder" is a powerful symbol of Christ like love (“agape love”) where Christ (The Bridegroom) is totally committed to His Bride (the Church).  He even gave His life for her.  How romantic is our God! [Eph. 5:25] “Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ loved the church and handed himself over for her.”

There are other reasons Malick brilliantly anchors the cinematic poem with Mont St. Michel, a metaphor of the fortress of Divine Love.  The tides in the area change quickly (as Malick captures) and have been described by Victor Hugo as "à la vitesse d'un cheval au galop" or "as swiftly as a galloping horse."  The tides set the stage for a challenging and chaotic reality in Neil and Marina’s search for a true and sustained love – emotions and passions of love quickly rush in and out of relationships with the force of a galloping horse.  Something else is more defining and essential for a true and sustained love. St. Augustine wrote in his Confessions, “My heart is restless until its rests in you, Lord.”  Malick gets to the core of this.  Marina and her daughter Tatiana follow Neil from romantic Paris back to his home in a sterile Oklahoma suburb.  Soon after the emotional and fantastical high of Paris and settling into Oklahoma, we soon begin to realize that though Marina and Neil are head over heels in Love, yet they are not married.  There is something missing in their love that leads to emptiness throughout the film between Marina and Neil.  Neil’s heart is not fully committed to Marina.  Even Tatiana senses it.

We are also shown what seems to be a flashback of Neil in a relationship with another woman, Jane (Rachel McAdams).  Malick reveals a defect in Neil’s heart that keeps him, or anyone, from experiencing the depths of true committed love.  A Jane voiceover says, “I trust you.”  It is evident that Jane wants to get married to Neil.  Further Jane asks, “Will you pray with me” but Neil responds, “I have no faith.”  If God (agape love) is not at the center of married love, it will be difficult to sustain and grow in commitment.  Soon, the viewer sees the love shared between Jane and Neil break apart as he begins to glance longingly at other women, and like with Marina, forever keeping his options open and uncommitted and turning love (in Jane's VO) into "nothing but pleasure, lust."

Malick interjects Fr. Quintana (Javier Bardem), a priest in the Oklahoma town, as a sentinel like figure to keep the viewer oriented through the changing tides of love that Neil and Marina experience.  The viewer hears a Fr. Quintana homily on committed love, “A husband is to love his wife as Christ loved the church, and give his life for her.”

Fr. Quintana is also shown to be human through a crisis with his own vocation to the priesthood, a vocation that is essentially a call to a committed loving relationship with God through serving His people. In his voiceover he says,  "I thirst" (for God) but worries that the "stream is dried up." He further confesses to God, "Everywhere you are present. And still I can't see you. You're within me, around me, and I have no experience of you. Not as I once did. Why don't I hold onto what I've found? My heart is cold. Hard.” 

Many film critics have read into this crisis of Fr. Quintana as a dreadful lowliness attributed to priestly celibacy – but given the context of the film, they totally miss the point here in Malick’s depth and insight into the mystery of true love.  Yes, Fr. Quintana appears lonely, but not for a woman.  His loneliness is rooted in feeling disconnected from God while he struggles with the challenges and demands of his calling to totally commit his life to the Bride (The Church).  Husbands and wives, though physically intimate, can also feel just as lonely when disconnected from each other and without agape love at the center of their marriage vocation.

Consequent scenes show Marina is unhappy because Neil, though still in love with her, is not totally engaged - He is not committed to her, let alone willing to give his life for her.  Marina returns to Paris only to wrestle with a restless heart and return again to Neil in Oklahoma.  But since the obstacle in Neil’s heart is never removed, their relationship goes from bad to worse (ugly arguments, violent outburst, Marina’s unfaithfulness).

Fr. Quitana says in another homily, “Love is not a feeling. It’s a command.  You shall love whether you like it or not. Even if you feel your love has dried up.  Maybe it’s being transformed into something higher.”  We finally see the beauty of this transformation of Neil’s heart.  After he punishes Marina with emotional abandonment for her unfaithfulness, he finally empathizes with her pain and kneels in front of her in a scene that not only forgives but asks for forgiveness as well.

The film’s true depth and sophistication on the mystery of true committed love (whether it be in marriage, a religious vocation, or otherwise), becomes strikingly apparent as Fr. Quintana is depicted achieving a spiritual epiphany. In his priestly calling to agape love, he comforts a succession of suffering people — the old, the anguished, the addicted, the crippled, the sick, and the dying — he recites a devotion of St. Patrick: "Christ be with me. Christ before me. Christ behind me. Christ in me. Christ beneath me. Christ above me. Christ on my right. Christ on my left. Christ in the heart." The sequence reaches its climax with the recitation of a prayer by Cardinal Newman (one that was also prayed daily by Mother Teresa's Sisters of the Missionaries of Charity): "Flood our souls with your spirit and life so completely that our lives may only be a reflection of yours. Shine through us. Show us how to seek you. We were made to see you."

In the wondrous joy of romantic love, in self-giving sacrifice, in our suffering and the suffering of others, in the charity we offer to those in pain, in the resplendent beauty of the natural world – the mystery of true love is found.  In To the Wonder, Malick reveals another echo of God’s mysterious relationship with humanity.  We are made for life everlasting with God and God’s love for us is always present all around us.  He is totally committed to us! If we just open the eyes of our hearts to see.  Could it be that Malick is developing as one the great mystic theologians of our time?

There is so much depth to this film.  It most likely will not be popular because it takes work.  However, the more you reflect on this film, like in prayer, the more it will reveal itself to you.  This is what makes this Malick film so meaningful and timeless and beautiful – and why New Ethos gives it its Logo Award of Excellence!

Monday, July 11, 2011

Tree of Life: New Ethos Award for Excellence in Entertainment



Not Your Ordinary Hollywood Film - It’s Magnificently Extraordinary

If you are looking for that ordinary Hollywood screen experience, you know, grabbing a bag of popcorn, a pop (I am from Chicago) and venturing into a dark theater to escape from your cares and worries, with Tree of Life, you will have an extraordinary experience. You might find yourself at film’s end still with that full bag of popcorn/pop, sitting in awe, because you just encountered something (or should I say, someone) extraordinary – that which is much more fulfilling and thirst quenching. In the words of St. Ambrose, "That than which nothing greater can be thought." Director Terrence Malick gets us close to thinking about and feeling “That” which in fact accompanies, consoles, and strengthens us through our cares, worries, and grief.

Tree of Life is not your ordinary escapist form of Hollywood entertainment; rather as part of our earthly journey, it is a meditation and an encounter with Divine Love. Nor is Tree of Life your ordinary propaganda “Christian” film. Flannery O’Connor wrote, “You tell a story because a statement would be inadequate.” Tree of Life communicates to us a metaphysical experience because a story with conventional plots and characters arcs would be inadequate. Tree of Life’s dialogue is essentially prayer, its soundtrack is a soaring and triumphal celestial symphony, and its silent sequences (if you are patient enough to listen) speak volumes to the depths of the human heart.

The movie opens with a quotation from the book of Job: “where were you when I founded the earth…while the morning stars sang in chorus and all the sons of God shouted for joy” (Job 38). Malick’s film opens with a couple, the O’Briens (played by Brad Pitt and Jessica Chastain), who have been informed that their 19 year old son has died.  They begin to experience a Job-like confusion and crisis: It begs the question, “Why God have you done this to them?”


How does Malick seem to answer that and a few other other transcendent questions that haunt every human soul? He presents to us a glimpse into the grandeur of the cosmos. He also gives us a view into the human lives of the O’Brien’s, years before the tragic news, a family of 5 (3 boys), living in 1950s Waco, Texas, and how those lives interrelate within the universal drama of creation. The father, Mr. O’Brien (played exceptional well by Brad Pitt, a father too) is represented as the human response through nature: strong, conflictual, hard-edged, and violent. The mother, Mrs. O’Brien (also an exceptional performance by Jessica Chastain), represents the response through grace: gentle, loving, and forgiving. And young Jack (Hunter McCracken)/Adult Jack (Sean Penn) represents the struggle, not to choose one way over the other, but to reconcile the two with each other – as young Jack says in this most profound line from the film, “Father, Mother, always you wrestle inside me.” Is that not a reality of the personal drama of every human person - namely, how we reconcile nature and grace?

Some early reviewers have criticized Mailck for basically not getting to the point with his long nature scenes (one is at least 15 minutes long). But when one browses through an art gallery and stumbles upon something profoundly magnificent, do they quickly want to move on, or sit in its truth, beauty, and goodness? Do not our souls thirst for savoring that which penetrates to the depth of our souls, rather than just fast “soul-food service” which just selfishly fattens one’s belly of fleeting sensual pleasure? Does not God give us a lengthy Psalm on his creative majesty in scriptures, for one, Ps. 145? I recommend meditating on this passage from Romans in response to the criticisms of Malick’s lengthy “Discovery Channel” sequences [Rom. 1:20] – “Ever since the creation of the world, his invisible attributes of eternal power and divinity have been able to be understood and perceived in what he has made.” Maybe in Malick’s view, there are just too many excuses today dismissing God’s loving Providential Design above all things.


NEW ETHOS EXCELLENCE AWARD
Overall, a New Ethos branding on quality entertainment weds beauty and grace, strength and sublimity to perfection of technique. Tree of life has done that.

The New Ethos Perspective on quality entertainment is not just awarding entertainment because it’s “great Catholic” or even “Christian” content while sacrificing the artistic value, because then it’s essentially propaganda and where is the truth, beauty, and goodness in that?  St. Thomas Aquinas wrote, “A work of art is good in itself (not in its utilitarian value).” The New Ethos award criteria accounts for a sense of mystery, characterized by faith, hope, and love, combined with a sense of manner. In other words, New Ethos looks for films that do not sacrifice “technique” for the sake of the message.

The New Ethos ”perspective of faith” is more an expression of man’s ultimate concern rather than identifying it with Judaism, Christianity, or with “going to church.” It is a perspective of film that is always reaching for the universal transcendent value of things inside, outside, above and beyond the world of the seen and unseen.

The New Ethos “perspective of hope” is always fresh, innovative, and open to the depths of reality and the possibilities of the mystery of all being. It is a perspective that is always new in any age.

The New Ethos “perspective of love” views a successful journey or story as one that exemplifies serving and sacrificing oneself for the good of another. It is a love that suffers for the sake of the good of another and desires that they be touched by the immutable and eternal transcendent values of truth, beauty, and goodness.

“We have not discovered the true beauty of any work of art until we have brought to light its eternal implications, which may be present even apart from the intentions of the work's creator."
-Flannery O’Connor

Tree of Life meets all New Ethos criteria with magnificence and it is why it is awarded the New Ethos Logo of excellence for truth, beauty, and goodness in entertainment. Hurray for Hollywood! Hurray for Terrence Malick! And Hurray for “That than which nothing greater can be thought!”

In 1987, The late Pope John Paul II, speaking to the entertainment industry in Los Angeles said entertainment media can be a principal agent for uniting the human race through truth, beauty, and goodness. Well, I look forward to seeing this film with my friends from other faith traditions. When was the last time you heard of a priest, rabbi, and eman going to the movies together (other than in a joke)?  In the Tree of Life, there is something profoundly common we can share and rejoice in.  St. Bonaventure wrote, “Not simply to be a knower but a lover of truth, beauty, and goodness.” 

There Something more powerful than the creation of the universe that exists around us – As Jessica Chastain (Mrs. O’Brien) says in the film, “Unless you have loved, your life will flash by.”

-Fr. Don Woznicki, Founder, New Ethos